RC
Architectural Decision Record (ADR)
Title: AI Model Hosting and Usage Decision
ADR ID: ADR-00X
Status: Proposed / Approved / Superseded
Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
Author(s): [Name(s), Org, Contact Info]
Reviewer(s): [Architecture board, cyber lead, PM, etc.]
1. Context
Briefly describe the context in which the AI model will be used:
- Project / Mission Area:
- Classification Level: (e.g., Unclassified, CUI, IL4, IL5, IL6)
- Stage in SDLC: (e.g., Code Generation, Testing, Planning Support)
- Team / Software Factory:
- Model Use Purpose: (e.g., LLM-generated tests, agentic task coordination, documentation support)
2. Decision
We have selected the following model hosting and usage pattern:
- Hosting Model:
- ☐ Public SaaS (e.g., OpenAI.com, Bard)
- ☐ Gov SaaS / Controlled Cloud (e.g., Azure OpenAI IL5)
- ☐ Self-Hosted / Open Source (e.g., LLaMA 2, Mistral)
-
☐ Hybrid / RAG with Controlled External Model Access
-
Model(s) Chosen:
- Access Method: (e.g., API call, RAG via broker, IDE plugin)
- Environment of Use: (e.g., Platform One, air-gapped enclave, GovCloud pipeline)
3. Rationale
Provide justification for the selected model and hosting choice:
| Factor | Consideration | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Mission Risk & Classification | ||
| Required Trust Level | ||
| Pipeline Integration Capability | ||
| Model Transparency / Versioning Needs | ||
| Sustainment Capacity | ||
| Vendor Compliance (FedRAMP, IL4/5) | ||
| Security & Privacy Constraints | ||
| Performance Requirements | ||
| Prompt / Output Governance Maturity |
4. Controls and Safeguards
Document the cybersecurity and governance guardrails in place:
- [ ] Model version control (locked or tracked)
- [ ] Prompt and output logging enabled
- [ ] Prompt templates versioned and reviewed
- [ ] Human-in-the-loop validation (where applicable)
- [ ] Egress controls for hybrid or external access
- [ ] Automated or manual rollback plan in place
- [ ] Integration with existing DevSecOps logging and policy
5. Consequences
Describe potential consequences or tradeoffs of this decision:
- Known Risks (e.g., latency, vendor lock-in, insufficient observability):
- Fallback Plan or Alternative:
- Periodic Review Timeline (e.g., every 6 months or upon model update):
6. Related Records or References
- [Link to system architecture doc]
- [Trust calibration checklist or framework alignment]
- [Supply Chain Risk Management record]
- [DoD AI Strategy / AI RMF mapping]
- [Testing and evaluation results, if any]